On closed linear subspaces embedded into functional Banach spaces and their finite-dimensionality


Abstract

This paper studies a Grothendieck‑type finite‑dimensionality problem for closed linear subspaces embedded in functional Banach spaces. Let \(S_{p}^{(q)} \subset L_{p}(M,d\mu)\) be a closed linear subspace of the Banach space \(L_{p}(M,d\mu)\) defined with respect to a probability measure \(d\mu\) on \(M\). We prove that if \(S_{p}^{(q)}\) is continuously (identically) embedded into \(L_{q}(M,d\mu)\) for \(q>p\), then its dimension \(\dim S_{p}^{(q)} = N \in \mathbb{N}\) satisfies the estimate \(\frac{1}{N}\left( \frac{\sqrt{\pi }\Gamma (\frac{N+\tilde{q}}{2})}{\Gamma (\frac{\tilde{q}+1}{2})\Gamma (\frac{N}{2})}\right) ^{2/\tilde{q}}\leq K_{p,q(m)}^{2},\) where \(1/\tilde{q} + 1/q = 1\), \(q = 2 + (p-2)2^{m} > p\) with \(p \ne 2\) and \(m \in \mathbb{N}\), and \(K_{p,q(m)}>0\) is a bounded constant. We also prove that certain closed linear subspaces of \(L_{p}(M,d\mu)\) consisting of continuous functions on \(M\) must be finite dimensional.

[type=editor, auid=000,bioid=1, orcid=0000-0002-3033-7419]

[type=author, auid=001,bioid=2, orcid=0000-0002-8151-4462]

Banach space, embedding, Grothendieck problem

1 Introduction↩︎

The problem of estimating the dimension of closed linear subspaces of the functional Banach space \(L_{p}(M,d\mu)\) for \(p>1\) with \(p \ne 2\) is classical in Banach‑space theory. Such estimates play an important role in operator theory, approximation theory, and related areas [1][8]. Applications also arise in dynamical systems and other branches of analysis [9][15]. A well‑known result in this direction is the classical theorem of Grothendieck, which provides an estimate for the dimension of a closed linear subspace \(S_{p}^{(\infty)}\subset\) \(L_{p}(M,d\mu )\hookrightarrow L_{\infty }(M,d\mu )\), and its generalization on the case of a linear closed subspace \(S_{p}^{(c)}\subset C(M;\mathbb{R})\) of continuous functions, identically embedded into \(L_{2}(M;d\mu )\). In this paper we consider the related problem of estimation of the dimension of closed linear subspaces \(S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M;d\mu )\) of the functional Banach space \(L_{p}(M,d\mu )\) with respect to a probability measure \(d\mu\) on \(M\), identically embedded into \(L_{q}(M,d\mu )\), where \(q=2+(p-2)2^{m}\;>p>1(\neq 2)\). A related version of this problem was previously studied in [16]. However, several gaps remain in the arguments presented there. In the present work we provide a different approach that resolves these issues and leads to a rigorous derivation of the corresponding dimensional estimates.

The main result is stated in the following theorem.

Theorem 1. Let a closed linear subspace \(S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu ),p>1(\neq 2),\) be identically embedded into a Banach space \(L_{q}(M,d\mu )\;\) for \(q=2+(p-2)2^{m}\;>p>\) \(1(\neq 2),\) where \(\;d\mu\) is a probability measure on \(M.\) Then \(\;\) the dimension \(\dim S_{p}^{(q)}=N\in \mathbb{N}\) of the closed subspace \(S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\;\) proves to satisfy the inequality \(\frac{\sqrt{\pi }\Gamma (\frac{N+\tilde{q}}{2})}{N^{\tilde{q}/2}\; \Gamma (\frac{\tilde{q}+1}{2})\Gamma (\frac{N}{2})} \leq K_{p,q(m)}^{\tilde{q}},1/\tilde{q}+1/q=1,\) for some bounded constant \(K_{p,q(m)}>0\).

Taking into account the estimation of the dimension \(\dim S_{p}^{(q)}=N\in \mathbb{N}\) of a linear closed subspace \(S_{p}^{(q)}\subset\) \(L_{p}(M,d\mu )\hookrightarrow L_{q}(M,d\mu )\;\)for \(q=2+(p-2)2^{m}>p>1(\neq 2),m\) \(\in N,\) obtained in Theorem 1, it is interesting to analyse its interpretation and possible relationship to a known result from the book [17] by G. Pisier, formulated below.

Theorem 2. In the space \(L_{2}(0,1;d\lambda )\) there exists a linear infinite-diemnsional closed subspace \(S_{2}\subset L_{2}(0,1;d\lambda ),\) which is a closed linear subspace of every \(L_{p}(0,1;d\lambda ),1\leq p<\infty ,\) and for which the corresponding norms are proportional, that is for arbitrary \(\;1\leq p<\infty\) there exist constants \(\gamma _{p}>0,\) such that for any \(f\in S_{2}\) the norms \(||f||_{p}=\gamma _{p}||f||_{2}.\)

In the special case, when \(q=\infty\), as well as when closed linear subspaces of the functional Banach space \(L_{p}(0,1;d\mu ),p>1,\) consist of continuous functions, there are stated the following Grothendieck type propositions.

Proposition 3. Let a linear closed topological subspace \(S_{p}^{(\infty )}\subset L_{p}(M;d\mu ),p>1(\neq 2),\) be identically embedded into a Banach space \(L_{\infty }(M;d\mu ),\) where \(d\mu\) is a probability measure on \(M.\) Then the dimension of the closed subspace \(S_{p}^{(\infty )}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\) proves to satisfy the inequality \(\dim S_{p}^{(\infty )}=N\leq K_{p,\infty }^{2}\) for some bounded constant \(K_{p,\infty }>0.\)

Proposition 4. Let \(S_{p}^{(c)}\subset C([0,1];\mathbb{R})\) be a closed subspace of the Banach space \((C([0,1];\mathbb{R}),||\cdot ||_{\infty })\) of continuous functions on the interval \([0,1]\subset \mathbb{R}_{+},\) which allows the identical embedding into a Banach space \(L_{p}(0,1;d\mu ),p>1,\) with respect to a probability measure \(d\mu\) on \([0,1].\) Then the subspace \(S_{p}^{(c)}\subset C([0,1];\mathbb{R})\) is finite-dimensional.

2 Embedding of closed subspaces into functional Banach spaces↩︎

Below we consider a closed linear subspace \(S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M;d\mu ),\) allowing the identical embedding into the Banach space \(L_{q}(M;d\mu ),\) where \(q>p>1.\) Then the following theorem holds.

Theorem 5. Let \(S_{p}^{(q)} \subset L_{p}(M,d\mu)\) be a closed linear subspace with \(p>1\) and \(p \ne 2\). Assume that \(S_{p}^{(q)}\) is identically embedded into \(L_{q}(M,d\mu)\), where \(q=2+\) \((p-2)2^{m}\;>p>1\) \((\neq 2)\), \(m\in\mathbb{N}\), and \(d\mu\) is a probability measure on \(M\). Then the dimension \(\dim S_{p}^{(q)} = N\) proves to satisfy the determining inequality \(\frac{\sqrt{\pi }\Gamma (\frac{N+\tilde{q}}{2})}{N^{\tilde{q}/2}\;\Gamma (\frac{ \tilde{q}+1}{2})\Gamma (\frac{N}{2})}\leq K_{p,q(m)}^{\tilde{q}}\), where \(1/\tilde{q} + 1/q = 1\) and \(K_{p,q(m)}>0\) is a bounded constant.

Let us consider a closed linear subspace \(S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\) of the functional Banach space \(L_{p}(M,d\mu ),\) \(p>1(\neq 2),\) with respect to a probability measure on \(M,\) satisfying, in addition, the identical embedding constraint \(S_{p}^{(q)}\subset \left( L_{p}(M,d\mu );||\cdot ||_{p}\right) \hookrightarrow\) \(\left( L_{q}(M,d\mu );||\cdot ||_{q}\right) \;\) for \(q>p>1(\neq 2).\) In order to state Theorem 5 we need some two lemmas.

Lemma 1. For any \(q>p>1,\) there exists a bounded positive constant \(K_{p,q}>1,\) such that \[||f||_{q}\leq K_{p,q}\text{ }||f||_{p} \label{S0}\qquad{(1)}\] for any \(f\in S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\hookrightarrow\) \(L_{q}(M,d\mu ).\)

As the linear subspace \(S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu ),\) embedded \(L_{q}(M,d\mu )\), \(q >p >1\), is closed in \(\;L_{p}(M,d\mu ),\) one can define the identity embedding mapping \[J_{p}^{(q)}:S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu ) \rightarrow L_{q}(M,d\mu ). \label{1a}\tag{1}\] If a sequence \(\{f_{n}:n\in \mathbb{N}\}\) \(\subset S_{p}^{(q)}\) converges in \(S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\) to an element \(f\rightarrow\) \(S_{p}^{(q)}\hookrightarrow\) \(L_{p}(M,d\mu )\) with respect to the norm on \(\;L_{p}(M,d\mu )\) and simultaneously its image \(\{J_{p}^{(q)}f_{n}:n\in \mathbb{N}\}\) \(\subset S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{q}(M,d\mu )\) converges to an element \(g\in L_{q}(M,d\mu )\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\) with respect to the norm on\(\;L_{q}(M,d\mu ),\) one can identify these limiting functions \(f\sim g\) almost everywhere. Really, since \((M,d\mu )\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\hookrightarrow L_{q}(M,d\mu ),q>p\;>1,\) from the estimations \[\begin{array}{c} ||\;f-g||_{p}\leq ||f-f_{n}||_{p}+||g-f_{n}||_{p}\leq \\ \leq ||f-f_{n}||_{p}+||\left( g-f_{n}\right) ||_{p}\leq \\ \leq ||f-f_{n}||_{p}+||\left( g-J_{p}^{(q)}f_{n}\right) ||_{q}\;\overset{ n\rightarrow \infty }{\rightarrow }0 \end{array} \label{1b}\tag{2}\] one obtains that \(f\sim g\) almost everywhere and the image \(J_{p}^{(q)}\) \((S_{p}^{(q)})\subset L_{q}(M,d\mu )\) is closed in \(L_{q}(M,d\mu ),q>p>1.\) The latter, owing to the Banach closed graph theorem [18][22], gives rise to the existence of such a positive constant \(K_{p,q}<\infty\) that \[||\;f||_{q}\leq K_{p,q}\text{ }||f||_{p} \label{2}\tag{3}\] for arbitrary \(f\in S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\hookrightarrow L_{q}(M,d\mu ),q>p>1\). Remark also, that the following estimations \[||f||_{2}\leq ||\;f||_{q}=||J_{p}^{(q)}f||_{q}\leq K_{p,q}\text{ } ||f||_{p}<\infty \label{3}\tag{4}\] hold for any \(f\in S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\;\hookrightarrow L_{q}(M,d\mu ),q>p>2,\) easily following from the Young inequality. \(\Box\)

Taking into account Lemma 1, we can formulate the next lemma, which is in some sense the converse to the inequality (?? ).

Lemma 2. There exists a constant \(K_{p,q(m)}>0,\) such that the following inequality \[||\;f||_{q}\leq K_{p,q(m)}\;\;||f||_{2} \label{S1}\qquad{(2)}\] holds for \(f\in S_{p}^{(q)}\hookrightarrow L_{q}(M;d\mu ),\) \(q=(p-2)2^{m}+2>p>1(\neq 2),\;\) and arbitrary natural \(m\in \mathbb{N}.\)

If \(1<p\leq 2,\) from the Young inequality \[||f||_{p}\leq \;||f||_{2} \label{S1a}\tag{5}\] for any \(f\in S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\hookrightarrow L_{q}(M,d\mu )\) one obtains inequality (?? ) \(\;\)for the bounded \(\;\) \(K_{p,q}>0.\) If \(p>2,\) then one can make use of the following inequality: \[||f||_{p}\leq ||f||_{2^{m}(p-2)+2}^{\frac{\;2^{m}(p-2)+2}{2^{m}p}}\text{ } ||f||_{2}^{\frac{2(2^{m}-1)\;}{2^{m}p}}, \label{S2}\tag{6}\] which holds for any \(f\in S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\) and arbitrary natural \(m\in \mathbb{N}.\) Now having put, by definition, \(q=2+(p-2)2^{m}\; >p>1(\neq 2),m\in \mathbb{N},\) the inequality (6 ) jointly with that of (?? ) gives rise to the searched estimation (?? ), where the constant \(K_{p,q(m)}=K_{p,q}^{\frac{(q-2)p}{2(q-p)}}\) \(>0\;\)is bounded, thus proving the lemma. \(\Box\)

(Proof of Theorem 5). Based on the lemmas above, one can proceed to proving Theorem 5. First we can observe that inequality (?? ) \(\;\) can be estimated, owing to the classical Young inequality, from the below as \[|l_{\varphi }(f)|\text{ }\leq K_{p,q(m)}\;\;||f||_{2} \label{S2a}\tag{7}\] by means of a bounded linear functional \(l_{\varphi }:(S_{p}^{(q)};||\cdot |_{p}|)\) \(\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\;\) on the Banach subspace \((S_{p}^{(q)};||\cdot ||_{q}),\) where \(l_{\varphi }(f)=(\varphi |f):=\int_{M}\varphi fd\mu\) for some \(\varphi \in (S_{p}^{(q)};||\cdot ||_{q})^{\prime }\simeq\) \((S_{p}^{(q)};||\cdot ||_{\tilde{q}}),\) \(1/\tilde{q }+1/q=1,\) under the constraint \(\;||\varphi ||_{\tilde{q}}=1.\) Taking inequality (7 ) and the evident embedding condition \((S_{p}^{(q)};||\cdot ||_{2})\subset (S_{p}^{(q)};||\cdot ||_{\tilde{q}}),\) one can calculate that \[\sup_{||f||_{2}\neq 0}\frac{|l_{\varphi }(f)|}{||f||_{2}}=||\varphi ||_{2}\leq K_{p,q(m)}. \label{S2b}\tag{8}\] If now to choose an orthonormal basis \(\;\Phi =\{\varphi _{1},\varphi _{2},...,\varphi _{N}\}\subset (S_{p}^{(q)};||\cdot ||_{2})\;\)for some \(N\in \mathbb{N},\) \((\varphi _{j}|\varphi _{k})=\) \(\int_{M}\) \(\varphi _{j}\varphi _{k}d\mu =\) \(\delta _{jk},||\varphi _{j}||_{2}=1,j,k=\overline{1,N},\) one can observe that a function \(\varphi _{a}:=\langle a|\varphi \rangle _{N}=\) \(\sum_{j=1}^{N}a_{j}\varphi _{j}\) \(\in\) \((S_{p}^{(q)};||\cdot ||_{2})\) has the norm \[||\varphi _{a}||_{2}=\left( \sum_{j=1}^{N}|a|^{2}\right) ^{1/2}=|a|_{N}, \label{S2bb}\tag{9}\] where the vector \(\varphi :=(\varphi _{1},\varphi _{2},...,\varphi _{N})^{\intercal }\in \left( S_{p}^{(q)}\right) ^{N}\) and took \(a\in \mathbb{ E}^{N},\) as an arbitrary vector. Having substituted the value of the norm ( 9 ) into (8 ), one obtains the inequality \[|a|_{N}\text{ }\leq K_{p,q(m)}, \label{S3}\tag{10}\] which should be combined with the imposed above condition \(||\varphi _{a}||_{ \tilde{q}}=1.\) Taking into account that \[||\varphi _{a}||_{\tilde{q}}^{\tilde{q}}=\int_{M}|\langle a|\varphi \rangle _{N}|^{\tilde{q}}d\mu =|a|_{N}^{\tilde{q}}\int_{M}|\langle \xi |\varphi \rangle _{N}|^{\tilde{q}}d\mu =1, \label{S2c}\tag{11}\] where \(a\in \mathbb{E}^{N}\;\)and \(\xi :=a/|a|_{N}\) \(\in \mathbb{S} ^{N-1},|\xi |_{N}=1,\;\) we can get rid of the spherical variables \(\xi \in\) \(\mathbb{S}^{N-1},\) if to apply to the above norm equality (11 ) the averaging method [23] over the unit sphere \(\mathbb{S} ^{N-1}.\;\;\)Namely, by integrating it with respect to the spherical measure \(d\omega _{N}(\xi ),\xi \in \mathbb{S}^{N-1}:\) \[|a|_{N}^{\tilde{q}}\int_{\mathbb{S}^{N-1}}d\omega _{N}(\xi )\int_{M}|\langle \xi |\varphi \rangle _{N}|^{\tilde{q}}d\mu =|a|_{N}^{\tilde{q}}\text{ } |||\varphi |_{N}||_{\tilde{q}}^{\tilde{q}}\frac{2\sqrt{\pi ^{N-1}}\Gamma ( \frac{\tilde{q}+1}{2})\Gamma (\frac{N}{2})}{\Gamma (\frac{N+\tilde{q}}{2})} =\;\omega _{N}, \label{S3a}\tag{12}\] we can equivalently obtain from (12 ) that \[\text{ }|a|_{N}=\frac{1}{|||\varphi |_{N}||_{\tilde{q}}}\left( \frac{\sqrt{ \pi }\Gamma (\frac{N+\tilde{q}}{2})}{\;\Gamma (\frac{\tilde{q}+1}{2})\Gamma ( \frac{N}{2})}\right) ^{1/\tilde{q}} \label{A0}\tag{13}\] where we denoted by \(\omega _{N}=\frac{2\sqrt{\pi ^{N}}}{\Gamma (N/2)}\) the surface of the \((N-1)-\) dimnsional sphere \(\mathbb{S}^{N-1}.\) \(\;\)Since the norm \(|||\varphi |_{N}||_{\tilde{q}}\leq |||\varphi |_{N}||_{2}=\left( \int_{M}\langle \varphi |\varphi \rangle _{N}d\mu \right) ^{1/2}=N^{1/2},\) the equality (13 ) jointly with the condition (10 ) yields the final numerical estimation \[\;\frac{1}{N}\left( \frac{\sqrt{\pi }\Gamma (\frac{N+\tilde{q}}{2})}{\Gamma ( \frac{\tilde{q}+1}{2})\Gamma (\frac{N}{2})}\right) ^{2/\tilde{q}}\leq K_{p,q(m)}^{2}, \label{A0a}\tag{14}\]

whose left hand side is bounded for those integers \(N\in \mathbb{N},\) which ensure the embedded subspace \(S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M;d\mu )\hookrightarrow\) \(L_{q}(M;d\mu )\;\;\) at given \(\tilde{q}=\) \(q/(q-1),\) \(q=2+(p-2)2^{m}\;\) \(>\) \(p(\neq 2),\;m\in \mathbb{N},\) to be finite dimensional, that is \(\;\mathrm{dim}\) \(S_{p}^{(q)}=N<\infty .\)

Regarding the critical case \(q=\infty\), since the representation (7 ) is not more acceptable, we need to consider that the linear bounded functional used there should be replaced by the following natural expression: \[|l_{x}(f)|\text{ }\leq K_{p,\infty }||f||_{2} \label{B1}\tag{15}\] for any \(f\in S_{p}^{(\infty )}\subset L_{\infty }(M;d\mu )\;\)and \(\;x\in M,\) where the value \(l_{x}(f):=f(x)\in \mathbb{R}.\) Having calculated the value \[\sup_{||f||_{2}\neq 0}\frac{|l_{x}(f)|}{||f||_{2}}=||l_{x}||\text{ }\leq K_{p,q}\; \label{B2}\tag{16}\] and using the Riesz representation theorem for the functional \(l_{x}:(S_{p}^{(\infty )};||\cdot ||_{2})\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) on the Hilbert subspace \((S_{p}^{(\infty )};||\cdot ||_{2})\subset (L_{2}(M;d\mu );||\cdot ||_{2}),\) there exists for any \(x\in M\) such a function \(g_{x}\in\) \((S_{p}^{(\infty )};||\cdot ||_{2})\) that \(l_{x}(f)=(g_{x}|f)\;\)and \(||l_{x}||\) \(=||g_{x}||_{2}\) for all \(f\in (S_{p}^{(\infty )};||\cdot ||_{2}).\) If now \(\Phi _{p}^{(\infty )}:=\{\varphi _{1},\varphi _{2},...,\varphi _{N},...\}\) \(\subset (S_{p}^{(\infty )};||\cdot ||_{2})\;\) is a complete orthonormal set of functions, that is \(||\varphi _{j}||_{2}=1,(\varphi _{j}|\varphi _{k})=\) \(\int_{M}\) \(\varphi _{j}\varphi _{k}d\mu =\) \(\delta _{jk},j,k\in \mathbb{N},\) the related Parceval equality \[||g_{x}||_{2}^{2}=\sum_{j\in \mathbb{N}}|(g_{x}|\varphi _{j})|^{2}=\sum_{j\in \mathbb{N}}|\varphi _{j}(x)|^{2} \label{B3}\tag{17}\] combined with the inequality (16 ) yields the next one: \[\sum_{j\in \mathbb{N}}|\varphi _{j}(x)|^{2}\leq K_{p,\infty }^{2}, \label{B4}\tag{18}\] which holds for any \(x\in M.\) Having integrated the obtained inequality ( 18 ) over the whole space \(M,\) we obtain that \[\mathrm{card}\text{ }\Phi _{p}^{(\infty )}=N\leq K_{p,q}^{2} \label{B5}\tag{19}\] for some \(N=\dim S_{p}^{(\infty )},\) thus proving the theorem. \(\Box\)

The last reasonings above, concerning the special case \(q=\infty ,\) can be reformulated as the following proposition.

Proposition 6. Let a linear closed topological subspace \(S_{p}^{(\infty )}\subset L_{p}(M;d\mu ),p>1(\neq 2),\) be identically embedded into a Banach space \(L_{\infty }(M;d\mu ),\) where \(\;d\mu \;\;\) is a probability measure on \(M.\) Then \(\;\) the dimension of the closed subspace \(S_{p}^{(\infty )}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\;\) proves to satisfy the inequality \(\dim S_{p}^{(\infty )}=N\leq K_{p,\infty }^{2}\) for some bounded constant \(K_{p,\infty }>0.\)

Moreover, as a technical consequence of the results above the following Grothendieck type [24] proposition holds.

Proposition 7. Let \(S_{p}^{(c)}\subset C([0,1];\mathbb{R})\) be a closed subspace of the functional Banach space \(L_{p}(0,1;d\mu ),p>1,\) with respect to a probability measure \(d\mu\) on \([0,1].\) Then the subspace \(S_{p}^{(c)}\subset\) \(C([0,1];\mathbb{R})\) is finite-dimensional.

As a closed subspace \(S_{p}^{(c)}\subset L_{p}(0,1;d\mu )\hookrightarrow C([0,1];\mathbb{R})\) of continuous functions on the interval \([0,1]\) can be closely identically embedded into the Banach space \(C([0,1];\mathbb{R}),\) from the Banach closed mapping theorem [20], [22] one derives the existence of such a constant \(K_{q}>1\;\)that the corresponding embedding operator \(J_{p}^{(c)}:S_{p}^{(c)}\subset L_{p}(0,1;d\mu )\hookrightarrow C([0,1];\mathbb{R})\) is bounded, that is \[||J_{p}^{(c)}f||_{\infty }\leq K_{p,c}||f||_{p} \label{S14}\tag{20}\] for any \(f\in S_{p}^{(c)}\subset (C([0,1];\mathbb{R}),||\cdot ||_{\infty }).\) Remark now that if \(1<p\leq 2,\) then the inequality \(||f||_{p}\leq ||f||_{2}\) holds for all \(f\in S_{p}^{(c)}\subset C([0,1];\mathbb{R})\hookrightarrow L_{p}(0,1;d\mu ).\) If \(p>2,\) we can observe that \(|f|^{p}\leq ||f||_{\infty }^{p-2}|f|^{2}\) for any \(f\in S_{p}^{(c)}\subset C([0,1];\mathbb{R} )\hookrightarrow L_{p}(0,1;d\mu ),\) whence by integration over the interval \([0,1]\) one easily obtains that \(||f||_{p}\leq ||f||_{\infty }^{\frac{p-2}{p} }||f||_{2}^{\frac{2}{p}}.\) Substituting the latter inequality into ( 20 ), we obtain that \(\;||f||_{\infty }\leq K_{q,c}^{p/2}||f||_{2},\) what jointly with the evident inequality \(||f||_{2}\leq ||f||_{\infty }\) gives rise to the dual inequality \[||f||_{2}\leq ||f||_{\infty }\leq K_{p,c}^{p/2}||f||_{2} \label{S15}\tag{21}\] for all \(f\in S_{p}^{(c)}\subset L_{p}(0,1;d\mu )\hookrightarrow C([0,1]; \mathbb{R}).\) As above, define for any \(t\in \lbrack 0,1]\) a bounded linear functional \(l_{t}:\) \((S_{p}^{(\infty )};||\cdot ||_{2})\) \(\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) on the Hilbert subspace \((S_{p}^{(c)};||\cdot ||_{2}),\) such \(\;\) that \(l_{t}(f)=f(t)\in \mathbb{R},\) which allows owing to the Riesz theorem the representation \(l_{t}(f)=(g_{t}|f)\) for all \(f\in (S_{p}^{(\infty )};||\cdot ||_{2}),\) where \(g_{t}\in\) \((S_{p}^{(\infty )};||\cdot ||_{2})\) and \(||l_{t}||\) \(=||g_{t}||_{2}.\) If now \(\Phi _{p}^{(c)}:=\{\varphi _{1},\varphi _{2},...,\varphi _{N},...\}\) \(\subset (S_{p}^{(c)};||\cdot ||_{2})\;\) is a complete orthonormal set of functions, that is \(||\varphi _{j}||_{2}=1,(\varphi _{j}|\varphi _{k})=\) \(\int_{M}\) \(\varphi _{j}\varphi _{k}d\mu =\) \(\delta _{jk},j,k\in \mathbb{N},\) the related Parceval equality \[||g_{t}||_{2}^{2}=\sum_{j\in \mathbb{N}}|(g_{t}|\varphi _{j})|^{2}=\sum_{j\in \mathbb{N}}|\varphi _{j}(t)|^{2} \label{S15aa}\tag{22}\] jointly with the inequality (16 ) gives rise to the inequality \[\sum_{j\in \mathbb{N}}|\varphi _{j}(t)|^{2}\leq K_{p,c}^{2}, \label{S15ab}\tag{23}\] which holds for any \(t\in M.\) Integration of the obtained above inequality (23 ) over the whole interval \([0,1]\) yields the constraint \[\mathrm{card}\text{ }\Phi _{p}^{(c)}=N\leq K_{p,q}^{2} \label{S15bb}\tag{24}\] for some \(N=\dim S_{p}^{(c)},\) thus proving the proposition. \(\Box\)

3 Conclusion↩︎

We have closed linear subspaces \(\;\) \(S_{p}^{(q)}\) of \(\;\)the functional Banach space \(\;(L_{p}(M,d\mu );||\cdot ||_{p}),p>1(\neq 2),\;\) allowing the identical embedding into the Banach space \((L_{q}(M,d\mu );||\cdot ||_{q}),q>p>1(\neq 2),\) regarding a probability measure \(d\mu\) on \(M.\)We derived the nuperical estimation \(\;\frac{1}{N}\left( \frac{\sqrt{\pi } \Gamma (\frac{N+\tilde{q}}{2})}{\Gamma (\frac{\tilde{q}+1}{2})\Gamma (\frac{N }{2})}\right) ^{2/\tilde{q}}\leq K_{p,q(m)}^{2},\) on the dimension \(\dim S_{p}^{(q)}=N\in \mathbb{N}\) of a closed identically embedded subspaces \(S_{p}^{(q)}\subset (L_{p}(M,d\mu );||\cdot ||_{p})\hookrightarrow (L_{q}(M,d\mu );||\cdot ||_{q})\) \(\;\)into \((L_{q}(M,d\mu );||\cdot ||_{q}),\) if \(q=2+(p-2)2^{m}\) \(>\) \(p>1(\neq 2),m\in \mathbb{N}.\) In case of the space \(M=[0,1]\subset \mathbb{R}_{+},\) endowed with an arbitrary probability measure \(d\mu ,\) we stated the Grothendieck type finite-dimensionality result for a linear closed subspace \(S_{p}^{(c)}\subset\) \(\left( L_{p}(0,1;d\mu );||\cdot ||_{p}\right) \hookrightarrow\) \(\left( C([0,1];\mathbb{R});||\cdot ||_{\infty }\right) ,\) identically embedded into the Banach space \(\left( C([0,1];\mathbb{R});||\cdot ||_{\infty }\right) .\) A general question about estimation of the dimension of a linear closed subspace \(S_{p}^{(q)}\subset L_{p}(M,d\mu )\hookrightarrow\) \(L_{q}(M,d\mu )\) for arbitrary \(q>p>1\) looks to be still open and needs more sophisticated techniques, mainly based on analysis of the complementary subspaces in \(L_{p}(M,d\mu )\) and \(L_{q}(M,d\mu ).\)

4 Acknowledgements↩︎

The author are thankful to participants of the Seminar at the Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Agriculture in Krakow for useful remarks, comments and suggestions.

References↩︎

[1]
A. K. Prykarpatsky and D. Blackmore, “A solution set analysis of a nonlinear operator equation using a leray–schauder type fixed point approach,” Topology, vol. 48, pp. 182–185, 2009.
[2]
P. L. Butzer and H. Berens, Approximation. 1967.
[3]
M. I. Kadec and A. Pełczyński, “Bases, lacunary sequences and complemented subspaces in the spaces \(L_p\),” Studia Mathematica, vol. 21, pp. 161–176, 1962.
[4]
S. G. Kreı̆n, Yu. I. Petunı̄n, and E. M. Semënov, Interpolation of linear operators, vol. 54. 1982.
[5]
Yu. I. Lyubich and O. A. Shatalova, “Isometric embeddings of finite-dimensional \(l_p\)-spaces over the quaternions,” Algebra and Analysis, vol. 16, pp. 9–24, 2005.
[6]
A. Michalak and J. Grala-Michalak, “On constructions of isometric embeddings of nonseparable \(L_p\) spaces, \(0<p\leq2\),” Commentationes Mathematicae, vol. 48, pp. 129–145, 2008.
[7]
P. W. Nowak, “On coarse embeddibility into \(l_p\) spaces and conjecture of dranishnikov,” arXiv preprint, 2004.
[8]
A. Plichko, “Rate of decay of the bernstein numbers,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, vol. 9, pp. 1–14, 2012.
[9]
C. Foias, G. R. Sell, and R. Temam, “Inertial manifolds for nonlinear evolution equations,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 73, pp. 309–353, 1988.
[10]
T. Kato, “Nonlinear evolution equations in banach spaces,” Proceedings of Symposia on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 45, pp. 9–23, 1986.
[11]
O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, “Finite-dimensionality of bounded invariant sets for navier–stokes systems and other dissipative systems,” Zap. Nauchn. Sem. LOMI, vol. 163, pp. 105–129, 1987.
[12]
O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, “Estimates of the fractal dimension and of the number of deterministic modes for invariant sets of dynamical systems,” Zap. Nauchn. Sem. LOMI, vol. 163, pp. 105–129, 1987.
[13]
H. Ninomiya, “Some remarks on inertial manifolds,” Journal of Mathematics Kyoto University, vol. 32, pp. 667–688, 1992.
[14]
T. Tao, An introduction to measure theory, vol. 126. 2011.
[15]
R. Temam, “Infinite-dimensional dynamical systems in fluid mechanics,” Proceedings of Symposia on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 45, pp. 431–445, 1986.
[16]
A. A. Balinsky and A. K. Prykarpatski, “On the finite dimensionality of closed subspaces in \(L_p(M,d\mu)\cap L_q(M,d\mu)\),” Axioms, vol. 10, p. 275, 2022.
[17]
G. Pisier, The volume of convex bodies and banach space geometry. 2010.
[18]
S. Banach, Théorie des opérations linéaires. 1932.
[19]
T. Banakh, W. E. Lyantse, and Ya. V. Mykytyuk, \(\infty\)-convex sets and their applications to the proof of certain classical theorems of functional analysis,” Matematychni Studii, vol. 11, pp. 83–84, 1999.
[20]
P. D. Lax, Functional analysis. 2002.
[21]
M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of modern mathematical physics. Vol. 1: Functional analysis, vol. 1. 1972.
[22]
W. Rudin, Functional analysis. 1991.
[23]
F. John, Plane waves and spherical means. 1955.
[24]
A. Grothendieck, “Sur certains sous-espaces vectoriels de \(L_p\),” Canadian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 6, pp. 158–160, 1954.